10 Common Thesis Writing Mistakes to Avoid
Every year, thousands of students struggle with their thesis β and unfortunately, many of them make the same mistakes over and over again. These mistakes don't happen because students are lazy or untalented, but simply because no one warned them beforehand about what to watch out for.
I made several of these mistakes myself when writing my own thesis. Looking back, I could have saved myself a lot of stress and unnecessary work if someone had warned me in advance. In this article, I've compiled the 10 most common mistakes and explained in detail how you can avoid them.
π The 10 Most Common Mistakes:
- Procrastination and poor time management
- Choosing a topic that's too broad or too narrow
- Ignoring your advisor
- Incomplete or incorrect citations
- Ignoring formatting requirements
- Weak literature review
- Research methodology errors
- Incorrect interpretation of results
- Unstructured, confusing writing
- Neglecting the final review
1. Procrastination and Poor Time Management
This is the classic one β everyone knows it, and yet almost everyone falls into this trap. Writing a thesis is a long process, and the human brain tends to say: "I'll do it tomorrow," "I still have time," "I'll finish this exam first."
Why is this so dangerous?
- Everything converges at the last minute: Exam period, work, personal life β and you're supposed to write your thesis at the same time
- No time for revisions: If your advisor's feedback requires changes, you won't have time to make them
- Quality deterioration: A thesis written in a rush will never be as good as one written thoughtfully
- Stress and burnout: The final weeks can become a nightmare
β How to avoid it?
- Create a detailed timeline: Break down the work into weekly tasks and stick to it
- Start early: Once you have your topic, start reading and taking notes β don't wait until the last semester
- Build in buffer time: Plan at least 2-3 weeks of extra time for unexpected events
- Use deadlines: Set mini-deadlines for yourself (e.g., "Methodology chapter done by Friday")
- Pomodoro technique: 25 minutes of work, 5 minutes break β it makes starting easier
π Sample timeline for a one-semester thesis:
| Week | Task |
|---|---|
| Weeks 1-2 | Finalize topic, formulate research questions |
| Weeks 3-5 | Literature review, gather sources |
| Weeks 6-7 | Write theoretical background |
| Weeks 8-9 | Develop methodology and collect data |
| Weeks 10-11 | Data analysis, results |
| Weeks 12-13 | Introduction, summary, conclusions |
| Week 14 | Formatting, review, corrections |
| Week 15 | Buffer time + submission |
2. Choosing a Topic That's Too Broad or Too Narrow
Choosing your topic is one of the most critical decisions, and many people get this wrong. Some choose topics so broad you could write books about them, while others narrow it down so much that there isn't enough scholarly literature available.
β Signs of a too-broad topic:
- You can't summarize it in a single sentence
- You find hundreds of scholarly sources
- You feel like it will never end
- Your advisor also says: "Narrow it down"
Example: "The impact of social media on society"
β οΈ Signs of a too-narrow topic:
- You can barely find any scholarly sources
- You run out of things to say after a few pages
- You can't collect enough data
- Difficult to find a theoretical framework
Example: "The impact of TikTok on shoe purchasing behavior of 19-year-old women in Budapest in March 2026"
β A good topic:
"The influence of Instagram influencers on purchasing decisions of 18-25 year old women in the fashion sector"
- Narrow enough (Instagram, not all platforms; specific age group and sector)
- Broad enough (scholarly literature available, sample can be collected)
- Researchable (can be studied through surveys or interviews)
- Relevant and current
3. Ignoring Your Advisor
Many students think the advisor is just a signature on paper and that minimal contact is enough. This is a huge mistake.
Why is this a problem?
- You might go in the wrong direction: You could work on something for months that your advisor won't accept
- You miss out on valuable feedback: Your advisor knows what reviewers expect
- You make a bad impression: Advisors are human too β if you ignore them, they'll be less motivated to help
- Deadline problems: Your advisor also needs time to read and approve your work
π‘ How to work with your advisor?
- Regular consultations: Request meetings every 2-3 weeks β in person or online
- Send materials in advance: Don't let them see the text for the first time at the meeting β give them time to read it
- Prepare specific questions: Not just "Is this okay?" β but "In section 2.3, I planned the methodology this way, do you agree?"
- Accept criticism: They're more experienced β their feedback is for your benefit
- Document discussions: Email summary after each consultation
4. Incomplete or Incorrect Citations
Citation errors are among the most common formatting problems, and in the worst case, they can be considered plagiarism.
Common mistakes:
β Missing citations
Writing down others' ideas without citing the source. This is plagiarism, even if unintentional!
β Inconsistent style
Using APA format in some places and Harvard in others. You must use one consistent style throughout!
β Bibliography doesn't match the text
Citations in the text but not in the bibliography, or vice versa.
β Missing page numbers for quotes
Page numbers are mandatory for direct quotes!
β Solution:
- Use reference management software (Zotero, Mendeley) β it automatically generates citations
- Record sources while reading, not later
- Before submission, check that all in-text citations match the bibliography
- Ask someone else to review them as well
5. Ignoring Formatting Requirements
"Content is what matters, not form" β many people say. But the reality is that formatting errors are easily noticeable and create a bad impression even before the reviewer reads the content.
Common formatting errors:
- Wrong margins, font size, or line spacing
- Manual (not automatic) table of contents that doesn't match page numbers
- Missing or incorrectly placed table/figure captions
- Poor quality, blurry images
- Page numbering errors (e.g., page number on title page)
- Inconsistent heading formatting
π‘ Important!
At some universities, formatting requirements can account for 10-15% of the grade. And what's worse: serious formatting errors can result in your thesis being returned for corrections!
β Solution:
- Read your department's formatting guide AT THE BEGINNING, not at the end
- Use Word styles and automatic features
- Set up the document at the start of writing
- Print a test copy and check it physically as well
6. Weak Literature Review
The theoretical background is the foundation of your thesis. If this is weak, the whole structure wobbles. Many make the mistake of conducting only superficial literature research.
What are the signs of weak literature review?
- Too few sources: A bachelor's thesis needs at least 15-20 sources, master's thesis 25-30+
- Outdated sources: If your most recent source is from 2015, that could be a problem
- Only sources in one language: For most topics, English scholarly literature is essential
- Only online sources: Printed books and journals are often more in-depth
- Wikipedia and blogs: These are not scholarly sources!
π Where to find scholarly literature?
- Google Scholar: Free, massive database for scholarly articles
- University databases: EBSCO, JSTOR, Springer β accessible through library access
- ResearchGate: Researchers directly share their articles
- University library: Don't forget physical books!
- PubMed, IEEE, ACM Digital Library: Field-specific databases
7. Research Methodology Errors
The methodology is what distinguishes scientific work from opinion pieces. If you make mistakes here, your entire research becomes questionable.
Common methodological errors:
β Inadequate sample size
A 30-person survey is not representative of an entire country's population. Be aware of the limitations!
β Poor questionnaire design
Leading, misleading, or unclear questions. Test it on a small sample first!
β Method doesn't match objectives
If you're seeking deeper understanding, a questionnaire alone isn't enough β you need interviews too.
β Ethical issues
Collecting personal data without proper informed consent can be a serious problem.
8. Incorrect Interpretation of Results
You have your data, but what does it mean? Many people mess up here: either drawing overly broad conclusions or underinterpreting the results.
Mistakes to avoid:
- Correlation = causation: Just because two things move together doesn't mean one causes the other!
- Generalizing from small samples: 50 respondents from one city don't represent "all people"
- Selective data handling: You can't omit results that don't support your hypothesis
- Hiding limitations: Every research has limitations β describe them honestly!
β Good practice:
- Always connect results back to the theoretical framework
- Describe research limitations (sample size, time, geographical scope)
- If your hypothesis wasn't confirmed, that's also a result β don't try to "beautify" it
- Use cautious language: "results suggest" rather than "I proved"
9. Unstructured, Confusing Writing
You might know a lot about your topic, but if you can't describe it clearly, the reviewer won't appreciate it. Unstructured writing is the biggest barrier to reader understanding.
What to watch for?
- Logical structure: Every chapter should have a purpose and build on the previous one
- Paragraphs: One paragraph = one idea. The first sentence should introduce it
- Transitions: Have connecting sentences between chapters
- Not overly long sentences: If a sentence is longer than 4 lines, split it
- Active voice: "I demonstrated" instead of "It was demonstrated"
Example of good structure:
Paragraph opening: "The main finding of the research is that Instagram influences purchasing decisions."
Elaboration: "67% of respondents indicated that..."
Interpretation: "This aligns with X's (2022) earlier findings..."
Transition to next paragraph: "However, alongside positive effects, limiting factors are also observable."
10. Neglecting the Final Review
Your thesis is finally done! You submit it, and... it's full of typos, incorrect citations, misaligned formatting. This mistake is completely avoidable, yet many people make it.
What to check before submission?
β Final checklist:
Content
- β Spell check completed
- β All chapters build on each other logically
- β Points stated in introduction appear in the thesis
- β Conclusions are based on the results
Citations
- β All in-text citations appear in bibliography
- β Bibliography is in alphabetical order
- β Citation style is consistent throughout
- β All URLs are working
Formatting
- β Margins, font size are correct
- β Table of contents updated
- β Page numbers are correct
- β Table/figure captions are in order
Technical
- β Looks good after PDF export
- β File name is in proper format
- β Test print is fine
- β Plagiarism check completed
π‘ Pro tip:
Ask someone (friend, family member) who isn't familiar with the topic to read your thesis. If they understand the main points and don't find distracting errors, you're on the right track. A fresh set of eyes will notice things you've become blind to.
Summary
Writing a thesis isn't easy, but most mistakes are avoidable if you prepare in advance. I hope this article helps you avoid making the same mistakes that others have made before you.
π― Key Takeaways:
- 1. Start early β procrastination is your biggest enemy
- 2. Choose the right topic β neither too broad nor too narrow
- 3. Work with your advisor β they're your best resource
- 4. Cite consistently β use reference management software
- 5. Follow formatting requirements β read the guide at the beginning
- 6. Conduct thorough literature review β not just online sources in one language
- 7. Choose appropriate methodology β it should match your objectives
- 8. Interpret results cautiously β don't overgeneralize
- 9. Write with structure β logical organization, clear paragraphs
- 10. Review before submission β have someone else check it too
If you avoid these mistakes, you're already halfway to success. The rest is just persistence and hard work. Good luck with your thesis! πͺ